Education researchers’ perceptions of and experiences with the research ethics application process in Europe and beyond

Abbott, L, Grady, C (2011) A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: What we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 6(1): 319.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Anderson, EE, Solomon, S, Heitman, E, et al. (2012) Research ethics education for community-engaged research: A review and research agenda. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 7(2): 319.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Bell, K, Elliott, D (2014) Censorship in the name of ethics: Critical public health research in the age of human subjects regulation. Critical Public Health 24(4): 385391.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Bledsoe, CB, Sherin, AG, Galinsky, NM, et al. (2007) Regulating creativity: Research and survival in the IRB iron cage. Northwestern University Law Review 101(2): 593641.
Google Scholar | ISI


Borg, S (2010) Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching 43(4): 391429.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Braun, V, Clarke, V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77101.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Butler, J (1998) Ruled out: Vocabularies of the censor. In: Post, RC (ed.) Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, pp.247260.
Google Scholar


Carr, CT (2015) Spotlight on ethics: Institutional review boards as systemic bullies. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37(1): 1429.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Clarke, V, Braun, V (2013) Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist 26(2): 120123.
Google Scholar | ISI


Cortina, JM (1993) What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology 78(1): 98104.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI


Creswell, J, Plano-Clark, V (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Google Scholar


Dehli, K, Taylor, A (2006) Toward new government of education research: Refashioning researchers as entrepreneurial subjects. In: Ozga, J, Seddon, T, Popkewitz, TS (eds) World Yearbook of Education 2006: Education Research and Policy: Steering the Knowledge-Based Economy. London: Routledge, pp.105118.
Google Scholar


Dingwall, R (2008) The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research. Twenty-First Century Society 3(1): 112.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Dingwall, R (2012) How did we ever get into this mess? The rise of ethical regulation in the social sciences. In: Love K (ed) Ethics in Social Research. Emerald Group Publishing, pp.326.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Emmerich, N (2013) Between the accountable and the auditable: Ethics and ethical governance in the social sciences. Research Ethics 9(4): 175186.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals


Ferraro, FR, Szigeti, E, Dawes, KJ, et al. (1999) A survey regarding the University of North Dakota Institutional Review Board: Data, attitudes, and perceptions. Journal of Psychology 133(3): 272280.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Field, A (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd edn). London: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar


Gliem, JA, Gliem, RR (2003) Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In: Presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 8-10 October 2003. pp. 8288. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1805/344.
Google Scholar


Gray, BH, Cooke, RA, Tannenbaum, AS (1978) Research involving human subjects. Science 201(4361): 10941101.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI


Hammersley, M (2009) Against the ethicists: On the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 12(3): 211225.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI


Hemsley-Brown, J, Sharp, C (2003) The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education 29(4): 449471.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Israel, M (2017) Ethical imperialism? Exporting research ethics to the global south. In: Iphofen, R, Tolich, M (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Ethics. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Google Scholar


Israel, M, Hay, I (2006) Research Ethics for Social Scientists. London: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Jansen, P, Reijers, W, Douglas, D, et al. (2017) A reasoned proposal for shared approaches to ethics assessment in the European context. Stakeholders Acting Together on the Ethical Impact Assessment of Research and Innovation – SATORI. Enschede: University of Twente.
Google Scholar


Kalichman, MW, Plemmons, DK (2015) Research agenda: The effects of responsible-conduct-of-research training on attitudes. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 10(5): 457459.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Kehagia, AA, Tairyan, K, Federico, C, et al. (2012) More education, less administration: Reflections of neuroimagers’ attitudes to ethics through the qualitative looking glass. Science and Engineering Ethics 18(4): 775788.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline


Kitchen, J, Stevens, D (2008) Action research in teacher education: Two teacher-educators practice action research as they introduce action research to preservice teachers. Action Research 6(1): 728.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Kuckartz, U (2014) Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software. London: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Lewis, M (2008) New strategies of control: Academic freedom and research ethics boards. Qualitative Inquiry 14(5): 684699.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Librett, M, Perrone, D (2010) Apples and oranges: Ethnography and the IRB. Qualitative Research 10(6): 729747.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Liddle, BJ, Brazelton, EW (1996) Psychology faculty satisfaction and compliance with IRB procedures. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 6: 46.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Lidz, CW, Appelbaum, PS, Arnold, R, et al. (2012) How closely do institutional review boards follow the Common Rule? Academic Medicine 87(7): 969.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI


Lombardo, G (2017) The social sciences and ethical protocols and standards for research in social sciences today. In: Iphofen, R (ed) Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences, Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, Volume 1. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, pp.177184.
Google Scholar


Malouff, JM, Schutte, NS (2005) Academic psychologists’ perspectives on the human research ethics review process. Australian Psychologist 40(1): 5762.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Morris, N (2015) Providing ethical guidance for collaborative research in developing countries. Research Ethics 11(4): 211235.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals


Nicholls, SG, Brehaut, J, Saginur, R (2012) Social science and ethics review: A question of practice not principle. Research Ethics 8(2): 7178.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals


Nicholls, SG, Hayes, TP, Brehaut, JC, et al. (2015) A scoping review of empirical research relating to quality and effectiveness of research ethics review. PloS One 10(7): e0133639.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI


Nowell, LS, Norris, JM, White, DE, et al. (2017) Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16 (1): 113
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals


Oancea, A (2007) Research policy and education research: Accountability phobia, or a clash of interpretations? Research Intelligence 100: 2021.
Google Scholar


Oancea, AE (2016) Including ethics in social science research. In: Punch, K (ed) Developing Effective Research Proposals (3rd edn). London: SAGE.
Google Scholar


Plemmons, DK, Brody, SA, Kalichman, MW (2006) Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12(3): 571582.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI


Poggenpoel, M, Myburgh, C (2005) Obstacles in qualitative research: Possible solutions. Education 126(2): 304312.
Google Scholar


Punch, KF, Oancea, A (2014) Introduction to Research Methods in Education. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Google Scholar


Raykov, M, Honerød Hoveid, M, Pacheco Figueiredo, M, et al. (2016) EERA Invited Round Table: Ethics reviews of educational research studies in Europe and beyond: Challenges and ways forward. European Conference on Educational Research, Leading Education: The Distinct Contributions of Educational Research and Researchers, Dublin, Republic of Ireland, 25 August. Available at: https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/21/contribution/39186/.
Google Scholar


Saldaña, J (2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar


Scherzinger, G, Bobbert, M (2017) Evaluation of research ethics committees: Criteria for the ethical quality of the review process. Accountability in Research 24(3): 152176.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline


Schrag, ZM (2010) Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar


Schrag, ZM (2011) The case against ethics review in the social sciences. Research Ethics 7(4): 120131.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals


Scott, C (2008) Relationships: Ethics committees and research. In Piper, H, Stronach, I (eds) Don’t Touch: The Educational Story of a Panic. London: Routledge/Falmer, pp.12–22.
Google Scholar


Scott, CL, Fonseca, L (2010) Overstepping the mark: Ethics procedures, risky research and education researchers. International Journal of Research and Method in Education 33(3): 287300.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Shkedi, A (1998) Teachers’ attitudes towards research: A challenge for qualitative researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 11(4): 559577.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Shoenbill, K, Song, Y, Cobb, NL, et al. (2017) IRB process improvements: A machine learning analysis. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 1(3): 176183.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline


Sikes, P (2013) Working together for critical research ethics. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 43(4): 516536.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Silberman, G, Kahn, KL (2011) Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: The state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform. Milbank Quarterly 89(4): 599627.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI


Siminoff, LA, Caputo, M, Burant, C (2004) The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice. HEC Forum 16(1): 5371.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline


Wassenaar, DR, Mamotte, N (2012) Ethical issues and ethics reviews in social science research. In: Leach, MM, Stevens, MJ, Lindsay, G, Ferrero, A, Korkut, Y (eds) The Oxford Handbook of International Psychological Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.268282.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Wassenaar, DR, Slack, CM (2016) How to learn to love your research ethics committee: Recommendations for psychologists. South African Journal of Psychology 46(3): 306315.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Wynn, LL (2017) What is wrong with ethics review, the impact on teaching anthropology, and how to fix it: Results of an empirical study. Australian Journal of Anthropology 28(3): 269285.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Next Post

This Porsche Boxster Is Ready To Star In A Mad Max Sequel

Sun May 26 , 2019
One theory about how the universe could end requires its infinite expansion. It’s called the Big Freeze, and it’s our likeliest demise, dark energy be damned. It’d leave the universe as a cold, dark, motionless expanse. Only two things are likely to survive – Keith Richards and this custom Porsche […]