Press "Enter" to skip to content

Education researchers’ perceptions of and experiences with the research ethics application process in Europe and beyond

Last updated on 21/01/2020

Abbott, L, Grady, C (2011) A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: What we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 6(1): 319.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Anderson, EE, Solomon, S, Heitman, E, et al. (2012) Research ethics education for community-engaged research: A review and research agenda. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 7(2): 319.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Bell, K, Elliott, D (2014) Censorship in the name of ethics: Critical public health research in the age of human subjects regulation. Critical Public Health 24(4): 385391.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Bledsoe, CB, Sherin, AG, Galinsky, NM, et al. (2007) Regulating creativity: Research and survival in the IRB iron cage. Northwestern University Law Review 101(2): 593641.
Google Scholar | ISI


Borg, S (2010) Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching 43(4): 391429.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Braun, V, Clarke, V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77101.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Butler, J (1998) Ruled out: Vocabularies of the censor. In: Post, RC (ed.) Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, pp.247260.
Google Scholar


Carr, CT (2015) Spotlight on ethics: Institutional review boards as systemic bullies. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37(1): 1429.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Clarke, V, Braun, V (2013) Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist 26(2): 120123.
Google Scholar | ISI


Cortina, JM (1993) What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology 78(1): 98104.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI


Creswell, J, Plano-Clark, V (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Google Scholar


Dehli, K, Taylor, A (2006) Toward new government of education research: Refashioning researchers as entrepreneurial subjects. In: Ozga, J, Seddon, T, Popkewitz, TS (eds) World Yearbook of Education 2006: Education Research and Policy: Steering the Knowledge-Based Economy. London: Routledge, pp.105118.
Google Scholar


Dingwall, R (2008) The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research. Twenty-First Century Society 3(1): 112.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Dingwall, R (2012) How did we ever get into this mess? The rise of ethical regulation in the social sciences. In: Love K (ed) Ethics in Social Research. Emerald Group Publishing, pp.326.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Emmerich, N (2013) Between the accountable and the auditable: Ethics and ethical governance in the social sciences. Research Ethics 9(4): 175186.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals


Ferraro, FR, Szigeti, E, Dawes, KJ, et al. (1999) A survey regarding the University of North Dakota Institutional Review Board: Data, attitudes, and perceptions. Journal of Psychology 133(3): 272280.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Field, A (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd edn). London: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar


Gliem, JA, Gliem, RR (2003) Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In: Presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 8-10 October 2003. pp. 8288. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1805/344.
Google Scholar


Gray, BH, Cooke, RA, Tannenbaum, AS (1978) Research involving human subjects. Science 201(4361): 10941101.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI


Hammersley, M (2009) Against the ethicists: On the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 12(3): 211225.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI


Hemsley-Brown, J, Sharp, C (2003) The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education 29(4): 449471.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Israel, M (2017) Ethical imperialism? Exporting research ethics to the global south. In: Iphofen, R, Tolich, M (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Ethics. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Google Scholar


Israel, M, Hay, I (2006) Research Ethics for Social Scientists. London: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Jansen, P, Reijers, W, Douglas, D, et al. (2017) A reasoned proposal for shared approaches to ethics assessment in the European context. Stakeholders Acting Together on the Ethical Impact Assessment of Research and Innovation – SATORI. Enschede: University of Twente.
Google Scholar


Kalichman, MW, Plemmons, DK (2015) Research agenda: The effects of responsible-conduct-of-research training on attitudes. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 10(5): 457459.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Kehagia, AA, Tairyan, K, Federico, C, et al. (2012) More education, less administration: Reflections of neuroimagers’ attitudes to ethics through the qualitative looking glass. Science and Engineering Ethics 18(4): 775788.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline


Kitchen, J, Stevens, D (2008) Action research in teacher education: Two teacher-educators practice action research as they introduce action research to preservice teachers. Action Research 6(1): 728.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Kuckartz, U (2014) Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software. London: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Lewis, M (2008) New strategies of control: Academic freedom and research ethics boards. Qualitative Inquiry 14(5): 684699.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Librett, M, Perrone, D (2010) Apples and oranges: Ethnography and the IRB. Qualitative Research 10(6): 729747.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Liddle, BJ, Brazelton, EW (1996) Psychology faculty satisfaction and compliance with IRB procedures. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 6: 46.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Lidz, CW, Appelbaum, PS, Arnold, R, et al. (2012) How closely do institutional review boards follow the Common Rule? Academic Medicine 87(7): 969.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI


Lombardo, G (2017) The social sciences and ethical protocols and standards for research in social sciences today. In: Iphofen, R (ed) Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences, Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, Volume 1. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, pp.177184.
Google Scholar


Malouff, JM, Schutte, NS (2005) Academic psychologists’ perspectives on the human research ethics review process. Australian Psychologist 40(1): 5762.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Morris, N (2015) Providing ethical guidance for collaborative research in developing countries. Research Ethics 11(4): 211235.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals


Nicholls, SG, Brehaut, J, Saginur, R (2012) Social science and ethics review: A question of practice not principle. Research Ethics 8(2): 7178.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals


Nicholls, SG, Hayes, TP, Brehaut, JC, et al. (2015) A scoping review of empirical research relating to quality and effectiveness of research ethics review. PloS One 10(7): e0133639.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI


Nowell, LS, Norris, JM, White, DE, et al. (2017) Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16 (1): 113
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals


Oancea, A (2007) Research policy and education research: Accountability phobia, or a clash of interpretations? Research Intelligence 100: 2021.
Google Scholar


Oancea, AE (2016) Including ethics in social science research. In: Punch, K (ed) Developing Effective Research Proposals (3rd edn). London: SAGE.
Google Scholar


Plemmons, DK, Brody, SA, Kalichman, MW (2006) Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12(3): 571582.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI


Poggenpoel, M, Myburgh, C (2005) Obstacles in qualitative research: Possible solutions. Education 126(2): 304312.
Google Scholar


Punch, KF, Oancea, A (2014) Introduction to Research Methods in Education. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Google Scholar


Raykov, M, Honerød Hoveid, M, Pacheco Figueiredo, M, et al. (2016) EERA Invited Round Table: Ethics reviews of educational research studies in Europe and beyond: Challenges and ways forward. European Conference on Educational Research, Leading Education: The Distinct Contributions of Educational Research and Researchers, Dublin, Republic of Ireland, 25 August. Available at: https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/21/contribution/39186/.
Google Scholar


Saldaña, J (2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar


Scherzinger, G, Bobbert, M (2017) Evaluation of research ethics committees: Criteria for the ethical quality of the review process. Accountability in Research 24(3): 152176.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline


Schrag, ZM (2010) Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar


Schrag, ZM (2011) The case against ethics review in the social sciences. Research Ethics 7(4): 120131.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals


Scott, C (2008) Relationships: Ethics committees and research. In Piper, H, Stronach, I (eds) Don’t Touch: The Educational Story of a Panic. London: Routledge/Falmer, pp.12–22.
Google Scholar


Scott, CL, Fonseca, L (2010) Overstepping the mark: Ethics procedures, risky research and education researchers. International Journal of Research and Method in Education 33(3): 287300.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Shkedi, A (1998) Teachers’ attitudes towards research: A challenge for qualitative researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 11(4): 559577.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Shoenbill, K, Song, Y, Cobb, NL, et al. (2017) IRB process improvements: A machine learning analysis. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 1(3): 176183.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline


Sikes, P (2013) Working together for critical research ethics. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 43(4): 516536.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Silberman, G, Kahn, KL (2011) Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: The state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform. Milbank Quarterly 89(4): 599627.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI


Siminoff, LA, Caputo, M, Burant, C (2004) The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice. HEC Forum 16(1): 5371.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline


Wassenaar, DR, Mamotte, N (2012) Ethical issues and ethics reviews in social science research. In: Leach, MM, Stevens, MJ, Lindsay, G, Ferrero, A, Korkut, Y (eds) The Oxford Handbook of International Psychological Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.268282.
Google Scholar | Crossref


Wassenaar, DR, Slack, CM (2016) How to learn to love your research ethics committee: Recommendations for psychologists. South African Journal of Psychology 46(3): 306315.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI


Wynn, LL (2017) What is wrong with ethics review, the impact on teaching anthropology, and how to fix it: Results of an empirical study. Australian Journal of Anthropology 28(3): 269285.
Google Scholar | Crossref